New mic
Hello,
I own a Hohner HB52 and am looking for a second microphone.
I have the chance to acquire an original Shure 440SL from the late 50s or early 60s. It contains its original CM 99B86 CG element (dated July 1963) with an output of 1046 ohms. It’s coming from a friend who is both a harmonica player and a luthier.
Alternatively, there are the Husky mics. I’d lean toward the "Red Devil" element, which includes a volume control (the Shure doesn’t have one). I’m torn between the "Mini Bullet" and the "Howler" models, as well as which type of connector to choose. So far, I’ve only ever used the HB52.
My hand size is proportional to my height—I’m 184 cm (approx. 6'0") tall—but as I mentioned, I’ve never used any other microphone.
As for my amp, I use a classic Laney Cub 10, equipped with the recommended Weber Alnico speaker.
I also occasionally use a Lone Wolf Harp Break and a Mooer Anna Echo delay pedal.
Best regards.
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Robert suggests that I shouldn't rule out the King Tone; it has the same diameter as the Howler, is slightly shorter, and offers better grip.
Hello Mon1979.
The 440 is a large-body mic, I don't recommend that unless you have large hands (you can get used to it, but most students who pick one up feel that it's larger than they would like).
The mini is very small... I recommend the Howler, which is the same diameter as a small-body Shure from the 1940's or Astatic JT30 (the most used mic body by pro's since the beginning of time).
The Red Devil element is killer.
The screw-on output connector is the standard for harp mics... get that, and a cable from him that matches (or adapter and standard instrument/guitar cable).
Both mics will sound great. If you have held the Shure and like it, and it's cheaper, then go for it. If it feels a bit large in your hands, then the Husky makes sense.